|Subject:||differences between windows server 2003 sp1 and windows server 200|
|Posted by:||Greg (Gr…@discussions.microsoft.com)|
|Date:||Wed, 1 Mar 2006|
We are just starting the process to upgrade from 2000 to 2003. The question
that I had is, "Would it make more sense to use Windows server 2003 R2 at
this point?". What are the key differences with Windows server 2003 R2 as
opposed to Windows server 2003 SP1? Is it just features? Why use R2? Is R2
basically "Windows server 2003 SP2"?
Any documentation that explains the differences between the two would be of
Thanks for your help.